Apple’s new Mail Privacy Protection feature eliminates the ability for email marketers to measure opens. iOS Mail currently makes up 40% of email client market share. Add MacOS Mail to that, and half of email clients will soon be hiding open data.
But here’s the dirty secret: the accuracy of the open rate has been shaky and in decline for a few years now. Many corporate email security products block this information, as do privacy-centric email apps like HEY. Gmail’s image proxying has led marketers to create imprecise workarounds for measurement.
There’s even an entire mini-site devoted to tracking the death of the open rate.
So this fall, when half of email clients make open tracking impossible, it’s the nail in the coffin for this metric.
And you know what? The retirement of the open rate is a good thing for marketers, small businesses, and privacy advocates alike.
I’m the co-founder of an email marketing company, and I’ll confess: we offer reporting on campaign open rates. At the top of the page. In bold text. 28 pixels tall! We all want to know if our audiences read what we have to say.

Let’s start with the word “open.” Sounds like you’re walking to the mailbox and tearing open an envelope. But think about how you read email: one swipe of your phone and you’re glancing at them in line at Chipotle or during all-hands Zoom calls. Or maybe you tear through your inbox with the Outlook preview pane.
If an email graces your screen—even momentarily—the marketer who emailed it declares victory and marks you down as an open.

The case against open rates isn’t just theoretical—it’s backed by hard data. In September 2021, when Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) first launched, the impact was immediate. Within a single week, MPP accounted for 5% of all email opens tracked. More telling: unique open counts jumped 6.5%—nearly double the largest weekly increase systems had observed in the prior six months.
That’s the problem in a nutshell: open rates became inflated, not because emails were actually opened more, but because machine opens replaced human opens.
Fast forward to 2025, and the impact has only grown. Across email clients, Apple Mail addresses (icloud.com, me.com, mac.com) show significantly higher MPP adoption than Gmail or Outlook, meaning data fragmentation is a real issue. One report found that traditional open counts peak between 6:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. PST, but MPP-generated opens peak between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. PST—a completely different pattern that makes send-time optimization nearly impossible.
The bottom line: If you’re making strategic decisions based on open rates, you’re working with a metric that’s increasingly disconnected from actual engagement. No wonder email ROI analysis became so muddy for marketing teams relying solely on this metric.
Open rates sound so darned precise! Ask a sales pro about next month’s pipeline and they’ll say “about $100,000, give or take.” That’s not because they lost their brain cells on TikTok—but because they know those figures contain a lot of uncertainty.
Open rates are percentages of large numbers, so we tack on a bunch of decimal places which suggest accuracy as well as precision. Take a look at these open rate benchmarks from Mailchimp. If you’re a food truck with a 22.87% open rate, are you really 0.44% behind the pack?

The precision of open rates obscures all the things we don’t know.
| Metric | What it measures | Reliability | Why it matters | Action you can take |
| Open rate | The % of recipients who triggered an open signal | ❌ Poor—Inflated by privacy tech, bots, and mail clients | Doesn’t reflect genuine interest or intent | Can’t act alone; supplement with engagement metrics |
| Click-through rate (CTR) | The % of delivered emails with at least one link click | ✅ Good—Not affected by privacy protection | Indicates actual user action and interest | Improve copy, CTA clarity, and relevance; A/B test subject lines |
| Reply rate | The % of emails receiving a human response | ✅ Excellent—Direct engagement signal | Replies = qualified leads ready for conversation; improves deliverability | Focus on personalization; optimize messaging and CTA specificity |
| Revenue per email sent (RPME) | Total revenue ÷ emails sent | ✅ Excellent—Measures business impact | Directly tied to profitability and ROI; your actual business goal | Optimize entire funnel; segment for higher-value audiences |
| Conversion rate | The % of recipients completing a desired action (purchase, signup, meeting booked) | ✅ Excellent—Business outcome metric | Proves campaign drove meaningful business results | Track attribution windows; test landing pages and offers |
| Deliverability/Inbox placement rate | The % of emails landing in primary inbox vs. spam folder | ✅ Good—Technical metric affecting all others | Affects all downstream metrics; foundation of campaign success | Monitor sender reputation; maintain list hygiene; authenticate domain (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) |
Key insight: The most successful email teams track multiple metrics together. Open rate by itself tells you nothing; reply rate + click rate + revenue per email tells you everything.
But the real problem with open rate is this: It’s a distraction from outcomes that really matter. Email campaigns aren’t advertising. We don’t measure them by the impression.
The McNamara fallacy warns against only measuring the easily-measured things, and the story goes like this:
If we are to be marketers who truly care about sales and growth outcomes, then open rates no longer deserve a place in a marketer’s toolbox—not when more than half of your readers are ignored.
Here’s a real-world example that illustrates why chasing open rates—and even CTR alone—can lead you astray.
An ecommerce team ran A/B tests on their holiday email campaign in Q4 2021. Test Version A had the highest click-through rate: a 44% boost over the control. By traditional metrics, it should have been the winner.
But when the team looked at Revenue Per Thousand Emails (RPME), the picture flipped entirely.
Wait—how did Test Version B win with a lower click-through rate? Because while fewer people clicked, the people who did clicked on higher-value offers. Test Version B had an average order value (AOV) of $1,019.37 compared to the control’s $146.11. That 588% AOV difference more than made up for the lower transaction volume.
Across 14 total tests in that campaign, if the team had used CTR alone as their KPI, they would have been wrong 36% of the time and inconclusive 57% of the time. Only 7% of the time would CTR correctly predict the highest-revenue version.
The lesson: Email metrics only tell you part of the story. Revenue per email sent—your actual business metric—tells you the whole story.
So how do we measure our email marketing efforts? I’ll start with one that seems to often be forgotten:
Email isn’t advertising: it’s communication. So why not ask your audience what they’re thinking? What problem are they trying to solve this week? I bet they’ll tell you!
Why reply rate beats open rate: Unlike open rates, which are generated by mail clients, previews, and automated systems, replies are genuine human engagement. When someone takes 30 seconds to respond to your email, they’re signaling that your message resonated enough to warrant a response.
The data backs this up. Cold email campaigns with no personalization see reply rates around 1-4%. But campaigns with personalization see 5-9% reply rates—and top performers who combine tight segmentation, specific value propositions, and clear calls-to-action can hit 15% or higher.
Here’s what high-performing cold email looks like:
Generic CTA: “Are you available for a call?” Result: 5.2% response rate
Specific CTA: “Worth a 15-minute screen share next Tuesday or Thursday?” Result: 18.4% response rate
The difference? The winning CTA:
- Specifies time commitment (15 minutes, not vague “a call”)
- Offers concrete options (Tuesday or Thursday)
- Delivers tangible value upfront (screen share, not generic meeting)
- Removes friction (recipient can say yes immediately)
My favorite part of being the sender on the occasional Nutshell campaign is the dose of questions, feedback, rants, and praise that appears in my inbox. Your audience has something to say, and it might be more valuable to your business than a 1.127% increase in open rate.
Even better: When people reply to your emails, it sends signals to email providers about the quality of your messages, which improves your future deliverability. Replies literally make your next campaign more likely to reach the inbox.
Did your campaign generate RSVPs to next week’s webcast? Did it bring attendees to that webcast? Did it book qualified meetings with the right stakeholders? While those metrics don’t show up at the top of MailChimp or Constant Contact, they’re much more important to your business than open rate.
Click-through rate (CTR) is more reliable than open rate because it measures actual user behavior—clicking a link is a deliberate action, not an automated system reading a pixel. Your email platform can track every click with reasonable accuracy.
But CTR is still just a proxy. The real question is: where did those clicks lead, and what happened after?
Strong email campaigns connect clicks to outcomes:
This is where CRM integration becomes critical. When you connect email metrics to your CRM, you can see which campaigns actually moved deals forward.

How many of your new customers engaged with your marketing content? How many of your email clicks turned into paying customers? Those outcomes are what we should be using as our north star.
Your email revenue metric might be:
The beauty of revenue metrics is they force alignment between marketing and sales. When both teams are focused on revenue—not vanity metrics—something remarkable happens: you naturally optimize for the right audience.
For example, one ecommerce company noticed they were sending 70% fewer campaigns but generating 50% more revenue. How? They stopped blasting everyone and started targeting their most engaged customers by recency. They used AI-powered segmentation to identify customers most likely to purchase based on browsing behavior, purchase history, and engagement patterns.
Result: fewer emails sent, higher revenue generated, better deliverability (because engagement rates improved), and happier customers (fewer unwanted emails).
Here’s the missing piece most marketing teams don’t talk about: You can’t make smart decisions about email metrics if they’re siloed in your email platform.
When email metrics live in MailChimp, revenue lives in Salesforce, and customer data lives in HubSpot, each system tells an incomplete story. You can’t see which email campaigns actually moved deals. You can’t identify which customer segments are most valuable. You can’t track attribution across the full customer journey.
But when your email platform integrates with your CRM, everything changes.
What a CRM-integrated email view looks like:
This is where email marketing stops being an art and becomes a science.
CRM platforms like Nutshell are built specifically for this. They combine email metrics, sales pipeline visibility, and revenue tracking in one place. Instead of jumping between tools to understand a single customer’s journey, you see everything in one contact record: every email opened, every link clicked, every meeting booked, every deal won.
The result: Sales and marketing teams speaking the same language (revenue), not arguing about metrics (open rates).
Take our guided tour to explore Nutshell’s incredible features!
One reason open rates have become less reliable isn’t just technology—it’s regulation. Privacy laws like GDPR (Europe), CCPA/CPRA (California), CASL (Canada), and LGPD (Brazil) are fundamentally changing how email works.
These regulations enforce permission-based marketing, require clear unsubscribe options, and penalize poor list hygiene. The side effect? Email teams that were blasting massive lists and relying on high volume are now forced to focus on quality.
And you know what? That’s actually good for metrics.
When you’re limited by privacy regulations to sending only to people who truly opted in, your engagement rates naturally improve. Your reply rates go up. Your conversion rates improve. Your sender reputation strengthens. Your deliverability improves.
This is the paradox of privacy-first email: By sending fewer emails to fewer people, you get better results.
Gmail and Microsoft reinforced this shift in 2024 by introducing stricter authentication requirements (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and penalizing senders with high spam complaint rates or low engagement. They’re essentially saying: “Prove your email is legitimate, and prove people actually want it. If not, we’re sending you to spam.”
The teams thriving in this environment aren’t the ones trying to maximize open rates. They’re the ones focused on:
This is why moving beyond open rates isn’t just a nice idea—it’s a necessity for sustainable email success.
The email marketing landscape is changing. Privacy regulations are tightening. Search engines and AI systems are demanding better structured data. And teams are finally realizing that open rates were always a distraction.
The good news? Better metrics are already here. Reply rates. Click-to-action metrics. Revenue per email. Replies. All of these give you clear visibility into what actually matters: Does this email move my business forward?
The transition starts with one step: Connect your email marketing to your CRM. When you do, you can stop guessing about email performance and start measuring it.
Try Nutshell free for 14 days and see how integrated email metrics transform your email strategy from an art into a science.
No credit card required. Full access to our all-in-one CRM, email marketing, and AI coaching features.
Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP), launched in September 2021, initially affected about 5% of opens in the first week. By 2025, adoption has grown significantly across iOS and macOS devices. The impact is clear: open data is increasingly unreliable.
In 2024-2025, Apple expanded MPP features with iOS 18, adding AI-generated email previews, new inbox categories, and branded sender icons. These changes make it harder for emails to even get noticed, not just harder to track opens.
The practical reality: You can no longer rely on open rates for strategic decisions. Apple Mail, Gmail, and other providers are all implementing privacy protections that either hide or manipulate open data. The solution isn’t to fight it—it’s to shift your metrics upstream to actions you can actually measure: clicks, replies, and conversions.
Click-through rate (CTR) shows the percentage of recipients who clicked a link—a real action. Unlike opens, which can be artificially inflated by preview panes or bots, clicks indicate genuine interest and intent. It’s a far more reliable engagement signal.

Use UTM parameters to tag email links, then track conversions in analytics or your CRM. Connect clicks to website behavior, form submissions, and revenue. Attribution models (first-click, last-click, multi-touch) help assign credit across your sales funnel.
Because replies = qualified leads ready for conversation.
When someone takes time to reply to your email, they’ve signaled interest. They’re not just passively opening an email—they’re actively engaging. And unlike open rates, replies are never inflated by technology or mail privacy features.
A CRM connects email engagement directly to contact records, deals, and revenue. Track replies, clicks, and conversions alongside pipeline stage. This gives sales teams visibility into which emails actually move leads forward—not just which got opened.
Join 30,000+ other sales and marketing professionals. Subscribe to our Sell to Win newsletter!